Advertisement
Advertisement

Aiken Scores 30, Hits Game-Winner in OT to Lift Harvard Over UMass, 70-67

Advertisement

With 1.9 seconds remaining in overtime, it was Bryce Aiken’s time to shine.

The sophomore point guard dribbled the ball up court, faked out a defender, stopped and drilled a 3-pointer to push Harvard past UMass, 70-67, in overtime on Saturday afternoon.


Final/OT

1 2 OT T
UMASS (1-1) 25 33 9 67
HARV (2-0) 29 29 12 70

After a pair of Aiken free throws put Harvard ahead, 58-55, with 12 seconds remaining in the second half, the Minutemen called a timeout.

Out of the break, Luwane Pipkins drilled a make from beyond the arc to knot the score at 58.

Aiken missed a layup with time expiring to send this one to an extra frame.

UMass, despite trailing by as much as four in overtime, would not go away. After another pair of Aiken free throws made it a 67-64 score in favor of Harvard, UMass opted for another timeout.

Eerily similar to the final second of the second half, Pipkins tied it up with a 3-point jumper with eight ticks to go. Unfortunately for UMass, that was too time for Harvard, as Aiken hit the game-winner.

Aiken poured in a career-high 30 points to lead all scorers. Chris Lewis added 15 points and Corey Johnson scored 10 for Harvard.

Pipkins led the UMass offense with 23 points and Rashaan Holloway added 15 points to complement a game-high nine rebounds.

Up next for UMass is the Barclays Center Classic where it will meet Niagara (1-0) on Sunday at 12 p.m.

Harvard will hit the road for a date with Holy Cross on Thursday at 7 p.m.

Advertisement

Check us out on our socials:   
Twitter: @PTSTNews and @TalkPrimeTime
Facebook Page: Prime Time Sports Talk
Join our Facebook Group: Prime Time Sports Talk 
Instagram: @primetimesportstalk

Advertisement

Share this:

More Money, More Problems.

I took a casual poll on whether or not college athletes should be paid or compensated when their respective university uses their image or likeness. The results were not as I expected. Out of about 100 people who responded, 72 of them said that college athletes should not be paid. This sample included people who had played and who were passionate about college athletics, people who were recently out of college and people who have been graduated for a long time. I personally voted that they should be compensated for their image being used for marketing or recruiting and in a way, they are with scholarships. But we all know that scholarships can only help so much.

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Browse by Category:
Advertisement
Advertisement

Visit ChiefsBlitz.com for
hard-hitting KC Chiefs coverage.

Advertisement